Use case · Legal, procurement and commercial teams
Find obligations, exceptions and commercial exposure across every agreement.
RAG.INS makes executed agreements searchable by meaning, so reviewers can compare clauses and verify every answer against the signed text.
The operating challenge
Important obligations are buried in long agreements, amendments and schedules. Manual review is slow, and a missed notice period or liability exception can become a costly surprise.
How the product fits
Index the complete contract set, keep documents separated by entity and permission, and let teams ask focused questions that return the governing clause and page.
How the workflow runs
- 1
Load agreements, amendments, annexes and approved templates.
- 2
Preserve document hierarchy, parties, dates and contract family.
- 3
Ask for clauses, obligations, renewals or deviations in plain language.
- 4
Review the answer beside its exact contractual source.
Operational outcomes
- Shorter first-pass review
- More consistent clause comparison
- Earlier visibility of obligations and deadlines
Information and systems used
- Executed agreements
- Amendments and annexes
- Clause libraries
- Procurement standards
Enterprise controls built in
The use case inherits the same deployment, permission and audit model as the product.
- Every answer is grounded in approved material and carries its source and page.
- Knowledge channels and server-side roles limit what each user may retrieve.
- Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment support residency and isolation requirements.
See this use case on your own process and data.
We will scope the workflow, sources, controls and success measure before proposing a pilot.
Book a 30-minute tailored demo